Look at this post recently published on TechCrunch – It is ugly standard 404 error message, but what is interesting is the server line which shows nginx 0.5.32

I have checked and indeed images served from assets.hulu.com have nginx server in response header.

This would be the first site of this (planned) scale to run Nginx. So far even though Nginx was used by many major companies in Russia, the rest of the world preferred lighttpd often due to better documentation and more active development community.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alexey Kovyrin

At for today, nginx has pretty nice documentation (russian, english, german) and really friendly community 🙂 The only major difference I see is that nginx is primarily developed by one developer. But it does not hurt its quality at all. Development is really active, bugs are fixed really fast. So, as you may guess – I vote for nginx 😉

thomas

and where is lighttpd-development these days?
the buglist is growing and not much happening there in commits.
I’d say if Jan isn’t doing development then no one else is. So the “only one developer” argument doesn’t count ;).

Alexey Kovyrin

As for module development – I just want to mention this page, which looks pretty fine for me, but honestly speaking, I’ve developed modules for nginx and lighttpd long time ago and can’t count my experience valuable in this question.

Anyways, both servers are great and it is nice to have such a great tools when we work on large projects.

slavi

The biggest site which uses nginx (nginx/0.5.30) is youporn.com, #40 at Alexa (see http://static.youporn.com/css/)
Hulu is way below.

James

Nginx ftw!!!

Radovan

WordPress.com runs on nginx.

http://wiki.nginx.org/Main