Is MySQL Statement-Based / Mixed Replication Really Safe?

May 26, 2022
Author
Przemysław Malkowski
Share this Post:

MySQL Statement-BasedThe binary logging format in MySQL has been ROW by default since MySQL 5.7, yet there are still many users sticking with STATEMENT or MIXED formats for various reasons. In some cases, there is just simple hesitation from changing something that has worked for years on legacy applications. But in others, there may be serious blockers, most typically missing primary keys in badly designed schemas, which would lead to serious performance issues on the replicas.

As a Support Engineer, I can still see quite a few customers using STATEMENT or MIXED formats, even if they are already on MySQL 8.0. In many cases this is OK, but recently I had to deal with a pretty nasty case, where not using ROW format was found to cause the replicas to silently lose data updates, without raising any replication errors! Was it some really rare edge use case? Not at all! Let me demonstrate a very simple test case below to illustrate how easy it is to end up in such a bad situation.

— source 

— replica

— source 

— replica

 

Another test, using UTC_TIME() compared against a column that was populated using the CURRENT_TIMESTAMP function:

— source 

— replica

Therefore, when a similar condition is used for update:

— source

— replica

Again replica ignored the update while there is no replication error reported. This particular scenario can be expected to happen really often in geographically-distributed database environments.

As the functions used here are not considered unsafe for replication, two usual safety actions are not performed:

  • no warning is printed in the error log when the STATEMENT format used
  • replication event is not logged in RBR format when the MIXED format is used but rather left the original query as it is

I find this potentially dangerous and hence reported it: https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=107293

Summary

ROW-based replication has become the standard in MySQL and is the most reliable one. It is also the only one permitted for virtually synchronous replication solutions like Percona XtraDB Cluster/Galera and MySQL Group Replication.

At the same time, STATEMENT or even MIXED format, may lead to data consistency issues, which can be undetected for a long time, making it very difficult to investigate when finally replication error happens as a result.

If there is anything that has prevented you from switching to ROW format yet, the sooner you deal with it the better.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Far
Enough.

Said no pioneer ever.
MySQL, PostgreSQL, InnoDB, MariaDB, MongoDB and Kubernetes are trademarks for their respective owners.
© 2026 Percona All Rights Reserved