EstimatE the REal Cost of Running PostgrESQL on KubErnEtEs
See how much you can save while gaining control, flexibility, and transparency by comparing public DBaaS costs to running cloud-native PostgreSQL from Percona on your own infrastructure.
Which managed PostgreSQL are you comparing?
Your PostgreSQL estate
Instance sizeCountStorage GBBackup GB
Add a row per instance size; set the count, and the storage & backup GB per instance (defaults shown, editable).
What this is. A database infrastructure price estimator - not a full TCO calculator. It models the cost difference between managed PostgreSQL and the same workload self-managed with Percona Distribution for PostgreSQL, on your own cloud VMs or on Kubernetes with the Percona Operator for PostgreSQL. "The same estate" here means matched vCPU, storage and backup volumes; it does not assert that one managed instance equals one self-managed VM or pod, nor validate equivalent HA, storage performance, or operational responsibility. Storage and backup GB are editable per instance. Not included: provisioned IOPS, throughput, WAL volume and storage architecture, data transfer, operational labour, monitoring, and commitment discounts. When support is on, Percona Expert Support is priced once (the cheaper of the per-server and total-vCPU models) and added to the self-managed side; managed-provider support is extra and not counted. Families: RDS = M5, Aurora = R5, Cloud SQL = N2, Azure = DCadsv6.
Talk to us about self-managed PostgreSQL
Enter your details and one of our team will get in touch to help with your comparison.
