Percona Server 5.1.54-12.5

Percona Server 5.1.54-12.5

PREVIOUS POST
NEXT POST

Percona Server version 5.1.54-12.5 is now available for download. It is now the current stable release version.

Functionality Added or Changed

Bugs Fixed

  • Bug #689830 – The development environment tests of show_slave_status_nolock work only on statement-based replication. They were failing when row-based replication was attempted. A check is now made for the replication type to test. (Oleg Tsarev)
  • Bug #688643, Bug #691234 – Boolean command line options and configuration variables in the slow_extended patch were not being processed properly.  (Oleg Tsarev)
  • Bug #692211 – Starting the server with a non-zero innodb_auto_lru_dump value could crash the server if the dump file did not exist. (Alexey Kopytov)

For more information, please see the following links:

PREVIOUS POST
NEXT POST

Share this post

Comments (9)

  • JS Reply

    Something seems to have changed in the package dependencies. Was this intentional?

    # rpm -U Percona-Server-shared-51-5.1.54-rel12.5.188.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
    warning: Percona-Server-shared-51-5.1.54-rel12.5.188.rhel5.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID cd2efd2a
    file /usr/lib64/mysql/plugin/libfnv1a_udf.a from install of Percona-Server-shared-51-5.1.54-rel12.5.188.rhel5.x86_64 conflicts with file from package Percona-Server-server-51-5.1.53-rel12.4.181.rhel5.x86_64
    file /usr/lib64/mysql/plugin/libfnv_udf.a from install of Percona-Server-shared-51-5.1.54-rel12.5.188.rhel5.x86_64 conflicts with file from package Percona-Server-server-51-5.1.53-rel12.4.181.rhel5.x86_64
    file /usr/lib64/mysql/plugin/libmurmur_udf.a from install of Percona-Server-shared-51-5.1.54-rel12.5.188.rhel5.x86_64 conflicts with file from package Percona-Server-server-51-5.1.53-rel12.4.181.rhel5.x86_64rver-51-5.1.53-rel12.4.181.rhel5.x86_64

    January 11, 2011 at 11:48 am
  • Mikeh Reply

    Does ALL_O_DIRECT apply to both redo and binary logs? Great feature by the way, lets you use that extra memory that would have been otherwise wasted on unnecessary Linux buffer caching.

    January 11, 2011 at 12:17 pm
  • Peter Zaitsev Reply

    Mike,

    Binary logs are written by MySQL SQL layer not Innodb engine so this setting does not apply to it.

    January 11, 2011 at 3:02 pm
  • Lance Reply

    Peter, the “Downloads – binary distributions” is wrongly linked to the previously version (12.4)

    January 11, 2011 at 9:19 pm
  • Aleksandr Kuzminsky Reply

    Lance,

    Thanks for the report – fixed.

    January 12, 2011 at 5:48 am
  • Aleksandr Kuzminsky Reply

    JS,

    Indeed, library files were moved from -server to more appropriate -shared package.
    To successfully update Percona-Server packages you need to update Percona-Server-shared-51 and Percona-Server-server-51 simultaneously either with YUM or rpm command:
    # yum update Percona-Server-server-51 Percona-Server-shared-51
    or
    # rpm -Uhv Percona-Server-shared-51-5.1.54-rel12.5.188.rhel5.x86_64.rpm Percona-Server-server-51-5.1.54-rel12.5.188.rhel5.x86_64.rpm

    January 12, 2011 at 5:59 am
  • jetstalker Reply

    It seems necessary to add “Provides: virtual-mysql-client” to package percona-server-client in debain version. Some packages depend on this. Example:
    $apt-cache showpkg cacti

    Dependencies: … virtual-mysql-client.

    January 13, 2011 at 7:24 am
  • Aleksandr Kuzminsky Reply

    jetstalker,

    That makes sense. I filed a bug, it will be resolved in the nearest release.
    https://bugs.launchpad.net/percona-server/+bug/702376

    Thanks!

    January 13, 2011 at 7:35 am
  • Brian Racer Reply

    Although not generally the best idea you can create a dummy package to get cacti installed:

    apt-get install equivs
    equivs-control dummy-mysql-virtual-client.ctl

    — edit dummy-mysql-virtual-client.ctl and make sure `Package:` line looks like:
    Package: virtual-mysql-client

    equivs-build dummy-mysql-virtual-client.ctl
    dkpg -i mysql-virtual-client.deb

    January 26, 2011 at 3:07 pm

Leave a Reply