EmergencyEMERGENCY? Get 24/7 Help Now!

XtraDB in CPU-bound benchmark

 | December 18, 2008 |  Posted In: Benchmarks


Peter said me that previous results https://www.percona.com/blog/2008/12/18/xtradb-benchmarks-15x-gain/ are too marketing, and we should show other results also.

Here is the run for CPU Bound,or it would be more correctly to say in-cache benchmark, because there is a lot of CPU remains idle. This run is exactly the same as Disk Bound but with innodb_buffer_pool_size=8G which is more than enough to fit all data in memory.

The XtraDB is showing very modest gain of about 2.5% in this case which can be attributed to measurement error too.

The story becomes more interesting if we look at CPU usage graph. As you can see they are very different for XtraDB and Innodb storage engines.

Innodb has generally higher CPU usage and more uniform while it has a huge dip in the middle. This happens because of checkpointing activity which can basically stall processing while dirty buffers are flushed. This is serious issue in real life application even though it does not significantly affects average throughput.

Honestly I’m not overly happy how XtraDB adaptive checkpointing performs in this case – we should see how to get it to be more uniform in this case.

So how does Average CPU usage looks ? You can see XtraDB delivers 2.5% better performance with 10% lower CPU usage…. which is more than the measurement error. So we think in workload which can utilize CPU more fully XtraDB will show more gains, though not 1.5x as for IO bound workload.

One may ask why CPU is not fully used in this case ? Honestly we did not investigate it further. One could be transaction commits (the run is with innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1) which causes some overhead even though system has BBU installed. Other is simply properties of TPC-C benchmark which is rather lock intensive and may not be able to use all CPUs simply due to row level locking. Third is internal Innodb contention issues which also may serialize things not allowing full CPU usage.

BTW if somebody has 16 core box he can provide access to so we can do some benchmarks we would appreciate it.

Vadim Tkachenko

Vadim Tkachenko co-founded Percona in 2006 and serves as its Chief Technology Officer. Vadim leads Percona Labs, which focuses on technology research and performance evaluations of Percona’s and third-party products. Percona Labs designs no-gimmick tests of hardware, filesystems, storage engines, and databases that surpass the standard performance and functionality scenario benchmarks. Vadim’s expertise in LAMP performance and multi-threaded programming help optimize MySQL and InnoDB internals to take full advantage of modern hardware. Oracle Corporation and its predecessors have incorporated Vadim’s source code patches into the mainstream MySQL and InnoDB products. He also co-authored the book High Performance MySQL: Optimization, Backups, and Replication 3rd Edition.

Leave a Reply


Percona’s widely read Percona Data Performance blog highlights our expertise in enterprise-class software, support, consulting and managed services solutions for both MySQL® and MongoDB® across traditional and cloud-based platforms. The decades of experience represented by our consultants is found daily in numerous and relevant blog posts.

Besides specific database help, the blog also provides notices on upcoming events and webinars.
Want to get weekly updates listing the latest blog posts? Subscribe to our blog now! Submit your email address below and we’ll send you an update every Friday at 1pm ET.

No, thank you. Please do not ask me again.