Cannot install Percona Server on Debian Jeese. packages have unmet dependencies

Lastest Forum Posts - September 1, 2015 - 6:27am
Is it me or the repo is broken?
Im using these instructions: https://www.percona.com/doc/percona-.../apt_repo.html

Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 8.1 (jessie)
Release: 8.1
Codename: jessie

soporte@ayuda:~$ su -
root@ayuda:~# apt-get install percona-server-server-5.6
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
percona-server-server-5.6 : Depends: percona-server-client-5.6 (>= 5.6.25-73.1-1.jessie) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libdbi-perl but it is not installable
Depends: libdbd-mysql-perl but it is not installable
Depends: libaio1 (>= 0.3.93) but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

Booking dot yeah! Booking.com’s Jean-François Gagné on Percona Live Amsterdam

Latest MySQL Performance Blog posts - September 1, 2015 - 12:00am

Booking.com, one of the world’s leading e-commerce companies, helps travels book nearly 1 million rooms per night. Established in 1996, Booking.com B.V. guarantees the best prices for any type of property, from small, family-run bed and breakfasts to executive apartments and five-star luxury suites.

The travel website is also a dedicated contributor to the MySQL and Perl community. Other open source technologies include CentOS Linux, Nginx, python, puppet, Git and more.

A Diamond sponsor of Percona Live Amsterdam Sept. 21-23, you can meet the people who power Booking.com at booth 205. Enter promo code “BlogInterview” at registration to save €20!

In the meantime, meet Jean-François Gagné, a system engineer at Booking.com. He’ll be presenting a couple of talks: “Riding the Binlog: an in Deep Dissection of the Replication Stream” and “Binlog Servers at Booking.com.”

Tom: Hi Jean-François, in your session, “Riding the Binlog: an in Deep Dissection of the Replication Stream“, you talk about how we can think of the binary logs as a transport for a “Stream of Transactions”. What will be the top 3 things attendees will come away with following this 50-minute talk?

Booking.com’s Jean-François Gagné

Jean-François: Hi Tom, thanks for this opportunity to give a sneak peak of my talk.  The most important subject that will be discussed is that the binary logs evolves: by the usage of “log-slave-updates”, the stream can grow, shrink or morph.  Said in another way: the binary logs of a slave can be very different from the binary logs of the master, and this should be taken into account when relying on those (including when replicating using intermediate master and when promoting a slave as a new master using GTIDs).  We will also explore how the binary logs can be decomposed in sub-streams, or viewed as the multiplexing of many streams.  We will also look for de-multiplexing functions and the new possibilities that are opened with that.


Tom: Percona Live, starting with this conference, has a new venue and a broader theme – now encompassing, in addition to MySQL, MongoDB, NoSQL and data in the cloud. Your thoughts? And what do think is missing – what would you change (if anything)?

Jean-François: I think you forget the best of all changes: going from a 2 day conference last year in London to a 3 day conference this year.  This will allow better knowledge exchange and I am very happy about that.  I think this event will be a success with a good balance of sessions focus on technologies and presentation about a specific use-case of those technologies.  If I had one wish: I would like to see more sessions about specific use-cases of NoSQL technologies with and in deep discussion about why they are a better choice than more traditional solutions: maybe more of those sessions will be submitted next year.


Tom: Which other session(s) are you most looking forward to besides your own?

Jean-François: I will definitely attend the Facebook session about Semi-Synchronous Replication: it is very close to my interest, especially as Booking.com is thinking about using loss-less semi-sync replication in the future, and I look forward to hear war stories about this feature.  All sessions dissecting internals of a technology (InnoDB, TokuDB, RocksDB, …) will also have my attention.  Finally, it is always interesting to hear about how large companies are using databases, so I plan to attend the MySQL@Wikimedia session.


Tom: As a resident of Amsterdam, what are some of the must-do activities/sightseeing for those visiting for Percona Live from out of town?

Jean-François: Seeing the city from a high point is impressive, and you will have the opportunity of enjoying that view from the Booking.com office at the Community Dinner.  Also, I recommend finding a bike and discover the city pedaling (there are many renting shops, just ask Google).  From the conference venue, you can do a 70 minutes ride crossing three nice parks: the Westerpark, the Rembrandtpark and the Vondelpark – https://goo.gl/P13Mc7 – and you can discover the first of third park in a shorter ride (45 minutes).  If you feel a little more adventurous, I recommend a 90 minute ride South following the Amstel: once out of Amsterdam, you will have the water on one side at the level of the road, and the fields (Polder) 3 meters below on the other side (https://goo.gl/OPDv5z).  This will allow you to see for yourself why this place is called the “Low Countries”.

The post Booking dot yeah! Booking.com’s Jean-François Gagné on Percona Live Amsterdam appeared first on MySQL Performance Blog.

pt table checksum and pt tablesync compatibility with ROW binlog format

Lastest Forum Posts - August 31, 2015 - 9:43pm

We are using MySQL 5.6.21 enterprise version with master slave configuration. Binlog format is ROW.

It was mentioned in one of the post that there are some compatibility issues with pt table checksum and pt tablesync tool with respect to ROW based binlog format. Can anyone please clarify regarding the same.

Issue applying logs to full backup

Lastest Forum Posts - August 31, 2015 - 6:03pm
Hi - I'm trying to apply the logs to a full back up I just took. However, I'm receiving the following error:

: innobackupex: got a fatal error with the following stacktrace: at /usr/bin/innobackupex line 3910 main::check_args() called at /usr/bin/innobackupex line 1531 innobackupex: Error: Too many command line arguments

To take my backup, I ran the following command:
: innobackupex -user=root --no-timestamp /backup/prod-db/percona/2015-08-30

After the completed, successfully, I attempted to apply the logs to give myself a stable backup to restore from:
: innobackupex —apply-log /backup/prod-db/percona/2015-08-30

Running this commend resulted in the error message above.

Additional information:
Using server version 5.5.41-0+wheezy1
xtrabackup version 2.2.12 based on MySQL server 5.6.24 Linux (x86_64) (revision id: 8726828)

Any help is appreciated!


pt-online-schema change and replication

Lastest Forum Posts - August 31, 2015 - 5:13am

Sorry if this is a repeat issue. Over the weekend I used pt-online-schema-change to alter a 2.5 billion row table on one of our slaves. I did not switch the tables or drop the original table. The triggers are still inplace to change the new table when the original table is updated. There is only replication traffic to this server. pt-osc was chosen because a straight alter table would take 72 hours to run. When replication was turned back on new rows are seen in the old table but they are not making it to the new table. The plan is to promote this slave to a new master so that the outage window can be shortened significantly. Then the old master will become a slave and synched from the new master. So, there are no triggers on the master, only on the slave. Replication is mixed mode on the master. The slave does not have binary logging enabled.

We are running Percona 5.6.21-70 and Toolkit is 2.2.15-1.

How can I get the triggers on the slave to fire when the original table is updated by replication?

Thank you,


High-load clusters and desynchronized nodes on Percona XtraDB Cluster

Latest MySQL Performance Blog posts - August 31, 2015 - 3:00am

There can be a lot of confusion and lack of planning in Percona XtraDB Clusters in regards to nodes becoming desynchronized for various reasons.  This can happen a few ways:

When I say “desynchronized” I mean a node that is permitted to build up a potentially large wsrep_local_recv_queue while some operation is happening.  For example a node taking a backup would set wsrep_desync=ON during the backup and potentially fall behind replication some amount.

Some of these operations may completely block Galera from applying transactions, while others may simply increase load on the server enough that it falls behind and applies at a reduced rate.

In all the cases above, flow control is NOT used while the node cannot apply transactions, but it MAY be used while the node is recovering from the operation.  For an example of this, see my last blog about IST.

If a cluster is fairly busy, then the flow control that CAN happen when the above operations catch up MAY be detrimental to performance.

Example setup

Let us take my typical 3 node cluster with workload on node1.  We are taking a blocking backup of some kind on node3 so we are executing the following steps:

  1. node3> set global wsrep_desync=ON;
  2. Node3’s “backup” starts, this starts with FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
  3. Galera is paused on node3 and the wsrep_local_recv_queue grows some amount
  4. Node3’s “backup” finishes, finishing with UNLOCK TABLES;
  5. node3> set global wsrep_desync=OFF;
During the backup

This includes up through step 3 above.  My node1 is unaffected by the backup on node3, I can see it averaging 5-6k writesets(transactions) per second which it did before we began:


node2 is also unaffected:

but node3 is not applying and its queue is building up:

Unlock tables, still wsrep_desync=ON

Let’s examine briefly what happens when node3 is permitted to start applying, but wsrep_desync stays enabled:

node1’s performance is pretty much the same, node3 is not using flow control yet. However, there is a problem:

It’s hard to notice, but node3 is NOT catching up, instead it is falling further behind!  We have potentially created a situation where node3 may never catch up.

The PXC nodes were close enough to the red-line of performance that node3 can only apply just about as fast (and somewhat slower until it heats up a bit) as new transactions are coming into node1.

This represents a serious concern in PXC capacity planning:

Nodes do not only need to be fast enough to handle normal workload, but also to catch up after maintenance operations or failures cause them to fall behind.

Experienced MySQL DBA’s will realize this isn’t all that different than Master/Slave replication.

Flow Control as a way to recovery

So here’s the trick:  if we turn off wsrep_desync on node3 now, node3 will use flow control if and only if the incoming replication exceeds node3’s apply rate.  This gives node3 a good chance of catching up, but the tradeoff is reducing write throughput of the cluster.  Let’s see what this looks like in context with all of our steps.  wsrep_desync is turned off at the peak of the replication queue size on node3, around 12:20PM:

So at the moment node3 starts utilizing flow control to prevent falling further behind, our write throughput (in this specific environment and workload) is reduced by approximately 1/3rd (YMMV).   The cluster will remain in this state until node3 catches up and returns to the ‘Synced’ state.  This catchup is still happening as I write this post, almost 4 hours after it started and will likely take another hour or two to complete.

I can see a more realtime representation of this by using myq_status on node1, summarizing every minute:

[root@node1 ~]# myq_status -i 1m wsrep mycluster / node1 (idx: 1) / Galera 3.11(ra0189ab) Cluster Node Outbound Inbound FlowC Conflct Gcache Appl time P cnf # stat laten msgs data que msgs data que pause snt lcf bfa ist idx %ef 19:58:47 P 5 3 Sync 0.9ms 3128 2.0M 0 27 213b 0 25.4s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 19:59:47 P 5 3 Sync 1.1ms 3200 2.1M 0 31 248b 0 18.8s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:00:47 P 5 3 Sync 0.9ms 3378 2.2M 32 27 217b 0 26.0s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:01:47 P 5 3 Sync 0.9ms 3662 2.4M 32 33 266b 0 18.9s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:02:47 P 5 3 Sync 0.9ms 3340 2.2M 32 27 215b 0 27.2s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:03:47 P 5 3 Sync 0.9ms 3193 2.1M 0 27 215b 0 25.6s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:04:47 P 5 3 Sync 0.9ms 3009 1.9M 12 28 224b 0 22.8s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:05:47 P 5 3 Sync 0.9ms 3437 2.2M 0 27 218b 0 23.9s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:06:47 P 5 3 Sync 0.9ms 3319 2.1M 7 28 220b 0 24.2s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:07:47 P 5 3 Sync 1.0ms 3388 2.2M 16 31 251b 0 22.6s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:08:47 P 5 3 Sync 1.1ms 3695 2.4M 19 39 312b 0 13.9s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62% 20:09:47 P 5 3 Sync 0.9ms 3293 2.1M 0 26 211b 0 26.2s 0 0 0 3003k 16k 62%

This reports around 20-25 seconds of flow control every minute, which is consistent with that ~1/3rd of performance reduction we see in the graphs above.

Watching node3 the same way proves it is sending the flow control (FlowC snt):

mycluster / node3 (idx: 2) / Galera 3.11(ra0189ab) Cluster Node Outbound Inbound FlowC Conflct Gcache Appl time P cnf # stat laten msgs data que msgs data que pause snt lcf bfa ist idx %ef 17:38:09 P 5 3 Dono 0.8ms 0 0b 0 4434 2.8M 16m 25.2s 31 0 0 18634 16k 80% 17:39:09 P 5 3 Dono 1.3ms 0 0b 1 5040 3.2M 16m 22.1s 29 0 0 37497 16k 80% 17:40:09 P 5 3 Dono 1.4ms 0 0b 0 4506 2.9M 16m 21.0s 31 0 0 16674 16k 80% 17:41:09 P 5 3 Dono 0.9ms 0 0b 0 5274 3.4M 16m 16.4s 27 0 0 22134 16k 80% 17:42:09 P 5 3 Dono 0.9ms 0 0b 0 4826 3.1M 16m 19.8s 26 0 0 16386 16k 80% 17:43:09 P 5 3 Jned 0.9ms 0 0b 0 4957 3.2M 16m 18.7s 28 0 0 83677 16k 80% 17:44:09 P 5 3 Jned 0.9ms 0 0b 0 3693 2.4M 16m 27.2s 30 0 0 131k 16k 80% 17:45:09 P 5 3 Jned 0.9ms 0 0b 0 4151 2.7M 16m 26.3s 34 0 0 185k 16k 80% 17:46:09 P 5 3 Jned 1.5ms 0 0b 0 4420 2.8M 16m 25.0s 30 0 0 245k 16k 80% 17:47:09 P 5 3 Jned 1.3ms 0 0b 1 4806 3.1M 16m 21.0s 27 0 0 310k 16k 80%

There are a lot of flow control messages (around 30) per minute.  This is a lot of ON/OFF toggles of flow control where writes are briefly delayed rather than a steady “you can’t write” for 20 seconds straight.

It also interestingly spends a long time in the Donor/Desynced state (even though wsrep_desync was turned OFF hours before) and then moves to the Joined state (this has the same meaning as during an IST).

Does it matter?

As always, it depends.

If these are web requests and suddenly the database can only handle ~66% of the traffic, that’s likely a problem, but maybe it just slows down the website somewhat.  I want to emphasize that WRITES are what is affected here.  Reads on any and all nodes should be normal (though you probably don’t want to read from node3 since it is so far behind).

If this were some queue processing that had reduced throughput, I’d expect it to possibly catch up later

This can only be answered for your application, but the takeaways for me are:

  • Don’t underestimate your capacity requirements
  • Being at the redline normally means you are well past the redline for abnormal events.
  • Plan for maintenance and failure recoveries
  • Where possible, build queuing into your workflows so diminished throughput in your architecture doesn’t generate failures.

Happy clustering!

Graphs in this post courtesy of VividCortex.

The post High-load clusters and desynchronized nodes on Percona XtraDB Cluster appeared first on MySQL Performance Blog.

Mysql help

Lastest Forum Posts - August 31, 2015 - 1:08am
How to link a web inquiry form to my sql server

Linux Monitoring Plugin - "NaN value for Used Memory"

Lastest Forum Posts - August 30, 2015 - 11:07pm
I have installed Percona monitoring plugin into my cacti server and running without any issue. Only problem is with "used Memory" Value that shown as "NaN".

My Server Memory limit " 72G" . When I run the script manually, it shows negative value for hu option. I think, that is the problem.

[root@Monitoring-Srv ~]# /usr/bin/php -q /usr/share/cacti/scripts/ss_get_by_ssh.php --host --type memory --items hq,hr,hs,ht,hu,hv
hq:2990836121 hr:2377703424 hs:7340761088 ht:1242996736 hu:-5231743385 hv:7601856921
[root@Monitoring-Srv ~]#

I run the same script towards on one of my low memory capacity server [ 8 GB]. it shows all the value correctly.

[root@Monitoring-Srv ~]#/usr/bin/php -q /usr/share/cacti/scripts/ss_get_by_ssh.php --host localhost --type memory --items hq,hr,hs,ht,hu,hv
hq:2255319040 hr:157446144 hs:139264 ht:153554944 hu:5654937600 hv:8221396992
[root@Monitoring-Srv ~]#

Is there any max limit enabled in Memory plugin to show the value ?.

mysql server crashes on archive table

Lastest Forum Posts - August 30, 2015 - 4:45am
Server version: 5.5.44-0+deb7u1 (Debian) on raspberry pi.
In this server an ARCHIVE table with 5.635.816 records.
After a recent addition I tried an 'optimize' step:

ERROR 2013 (HY000): Lost connection to MySQL server during query
mysql> describe table p1_archive;
ERROR 2006 (HY000): MySQL server has gone away
No connection. Trying to reconnect...

This server-side crash consistently happens since then, on every optimize table, check table, on select .... into outfile, on mysqldump.
On running mysqldump with where clause I succeed in grabbing about 2.700.000 records into the dumpfile from all 5.635.816 in the table, before this server-crash happens.
pt-archive does not run: Cannot find an ascendable index in table...

Any suggestions as to how to recover the remainder?

Thanks in advance for any suggestion.

MySQL deadlock information incomplete

Lastest Forum Posts - August 28, 2015 - 2:11pm
I am investigating a deadlock in our application and find that the MySQL log is providing insufficient information. Specifically the LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK section from SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS\G is copied below.
Transaction 2 - We see lock HOLDS and WAITING information,
Transaction 1 - only WAITING information.
What is Transaction 1 holding and where is the cycle to cause deadlock?
Let me reiterate that I am not asking for ways to resolve the deadlock, rather why the conflicting lock information is incomplete and if there is any way to obtain more complete information.

The relevant table definitions are as follows.


NetworkAddress varchar (255),
Port int NULL ,
PartID int NOT NULL,


2015-08-25 20:24:58 0x1378
TRANSACTION 5564, ACTIVE 0 sec starting index read
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 24, OS thread handle 2280, query id 6587 localhost CoreSvc updating
delete from SystemSequence where NextId < _nextId
RECORD LOCKS space id 50 page no 3 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table `pangaea`.`systemsequence` trx id 5564 lock_mode X waiting
Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 32

0: len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;;
1: len 6; hex 0000000015bb; asc ;;
2: len 7; hex 3500000177102e; asc 5 w .;;

TRANSACTION 5563, ACTIVE 0 sec inserting, thread declared inside InnoDB 5000
mysql tables in use 10, locked 10
17 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 9 row lock(s), undo log entries 8
MySQL thread id 30, OS thread handle 4984, query id 6677 localhost CoreSvc update
insert CustomSystem (SystemID, NetworkAddress,Port, PartID )
values (_SystemID, _NetworkAddress, _Port, _PartID )
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 50 page no 3 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table `pangaea`.`systemsequence` trx id 5563 lock_mode X
Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 32

0: len 4; hex 80000001; asc ;;
1: len 6; hex 0000000015bb; asc ;;
2: len 7; hex 3500000177102e; asc 5 w .;;

Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 4; hex 80000002; asc ;;
1: len 6; hex 0000000015bb; asc ;;
2: len 7; hex b5000001280110; asc ( ;;

RECORD LOCKS space id 68 page no 7 n bits 72 index `PartID` of table `pangaea`.`customsystem` trx id 5563 lock_mode X insert intention waiting
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;


Percona Toolkit 2.2.15 is now available

Latest MySQL Performance Blog posts - August 28, 2015 - 10:30am

Percona is pleased to announce the availability of Percona Toolkit 2.2.15.  Released August 28, 2015. Percona Toolkit is a collection of advanced command-line tools to perform a variety of MySQL server and system tasks that are too difficult or complex for DBAs to perform manually. Percona Toolkit, like all Percona software, is free and open source.

This release is the current GA (Generally Available) stable release in the 2.2 series. It includes multiple bug fixes as well as continued preparation for MySQL 5.7 compatibility. Full details are below. Downloads are available here and from the Percona Software Repositories.

New Features:

  • Added --max-flow-ctl option to pt-online-schema-change and pt-archiver with a value set in percent. When a Percona XtraDB Cluster node is very loaded, it sends flow control signals to the other nodes to stop sending transactions in order to catch up. When the average value of time spent in this state (in percent) exceeds the maximum provided in the option, the tool pauses until it falls below again.Default is no flow control checking.
  • Added the --sleep option for pt-online-schema-change to avoid performance problems. The option accepts float values in seconds.
  • Implemented ability to specify --check-slave-lag multiple times for pt-archiver. The following example enables lag checks for two slaves:
    pt-archiver --no-delete --where '1=1' --source h=oltp_server,D=test,t=tbl --dest h=olap_server --check-slave-lag h=slave1 --check-slave-lag h=slave2 --limit 1000 --commit-each
  • Added the --rds option to pt-kill, which makes the tool use Amazon RDS procedure calls instead of the standard MySQL kill command.

Bugs Fixed:

  • Fixed bug 1042727: pt-table-checksum doesn’t reconnect the slave $dbh
    Before, the tool would die if any slave connection was lost. Now the tool waits forever for slaves.
  • Fixed bug 1056507: pt-archiver --check-slave-lag agressiveness
    The tool now checks replication lag every 100 rows instead of every row, which significantly improves efficiency.
  • Fixed bug 1215587: Adding underscores to constraints when using pt-online-schema-change can create issues with constraint name length
    Before, multiple schema changes lead to underscores stacking up on the name of the constraint until it reached the 64 character limit. Now there is a limit of two underscores in the prefix, then the tool alternately removes or adds one underscore, attempting to make the name unique.
  • Fixed bug 1277049pt-online-schema-change can’t connect with comma in password
    For all tools, documented that commas in passwords provided on the command line must be escaped.
  • Fixed bug 1441928: Unlimited chunk size when using pt-online-schema-change with --chunk-size-limit=0 inhibits checksumming of single-nibble tables
    When comparing table size with the slave table, the tool now ignores --chunk-size-limit if it is set to zero to avoid multiplying by zero.
  • Fixed bug 1443763: Update documentation and/or implentation of pt-archiver --check-interval
    Fixed the documentation for --check-interval to reflect its correct behavior.
  • Fixed bug 1449226: pt-archiver dies with “MySQL server has gone away” when --innodb_kill_idle_transaction is set to a low value and --check-slave-lag is enabled
    The tool now sends a dummy SQL query to avoid timing out.
  • Fixed bug 1446928: pt-online-schema-change not reporting meaningful errors
    The tool now produces meaningful errors based on text from MySQL errors.
  • Fixed bug 1450499: ReadKeyMini causes pt-online-schema-change session to lock under some circumstances
    Removed ReadKeyMini, because it is no longer necessary.
  • Fixed bug 1452914: --purge and --no-delete are mutually exclusive, but still allowed to be specified together by pt-archiver
    The tool now issues an error when --purge and --no-delete are specified together.
  • Fixed bug 1455486: pt-mysql-summary is missing the --ask-pass option
    Added the --ask-pass option to the tool.
  • Fixed bug 1457573: pt-mysql-summary fails to download pt-diskstats pt-pmp pt-mext pt-align
    Added the -L option to curl and changed download address to use HTTPS.
  • Fixed bug 1462904: pt-duplicate-key-checker doesn’t support triple quote in column name
    Updated TableParser module to handle literal backticks.
  • Fixed bug 1488600: pt-stalk doesn’t check TokuDB status
    Implemented status collection similar to how it is performed for InnoDB.
  • Fixed bug 1488611: various testing bugs related to newer Perl versions

Details of the release can be found in the release notes and the 2.2.15 milestone on Launchpad. Bugs can be reported on the Percona Toolkit launchpad bug tracker.

The post Percona Toolkit 2.2.15 is now available appeared first on MySQL Performance Blog.

MySQL/Percona Audit Log Plugin Not Working

Lastest Forum Posts - August 28, 2015 - 8:20am
I've been looking to implemement the Percona Audit Log plugin. So far I have installed it and configured it, and it seems to be working ok.
Except, I have installed it on a slave Database as I don't want to run it on my master database (because of the additional overhead, and the fact it requires a DB restart if I want to configure it), and it doesn't appear to be logging any queries.
I have set up a script to import the logfile back into a standalone MySQL instance so I can query it, and from what I can tell it only records events that happen locally on the slave, but ignores all queries that are replicated from the master.
I implemented it because I need a way to audit the types of statements being run on our databases (ALTER, UPDATE etc.) but if they're not going to be recorded it's not much use.
I can't see anything in the documentation for this (either Percona or MySQL). Does anyone else use this, and is it just me that has missed something or am I going to have to go back to the drawing board.
I'm running MySQL 5.5 with Statement Based Replication.

updating galera2 to galera3 in percona-xtradb-5.6 cluster

Lastest Forum Posts - August 27, 2015 - 3:20am

I have a percona cluster of three nodes running innodb 5.6 with galera 2.12. I wish to do a rolling upgrade from galera2 to galera3 .
I saw the article regarding the upgrade process which states that i should set wsrep_provider_options=”socket.checksum=1″ in order to have compatibilities with the different galera versions.

However, doing so, when i restart the server i get the following error and the server wont start.

"Unrecognized parameter 'socket.checksum'"

Any ideas?

MySQL distribution change e.g. MySQL community edition to Percona Server

Lastest Forum Posts - August 26, 2015 - 4:43pm
I would like to know process/steps to change following
5.1.34sp1-enterprise-gpl-advanced-log MySQL Enterprise Server - Advanced Edition (GPL)
to Percona Server 5.1.X ( 5.1 latest release)

Are these different MySQL distributions compatible with each other ( I understand that some version might have some extra features/performance etc) ? What is process to convert above to Percona release or Percona release to Community Release etc ?

Thanks a lot.

ObjectRocket’s David Murphy talks about MongoDB, Percona Live Amsterdam

Latest MySQL Performance Blog posts - August 26, 2015 - 1:07pm

Say hello to David Murphy, lead DBA and MongoDB Master at ObjectRocket (a Rackspace company). David works on sharding, tool building, very large-scale issues and high-performance MongoDB architecture. Prior to ObjectRocket he was a MySQL/NoSQL architect at Electronic Arts. David enjoys large-scale operational tool building, high performance OS and database tuning. He is also a core code contributor to MongoDB. He’ll be speaking next month at Percona Live Amsterdam, which runs Sept. 21-13. Enter promo code “BlogInterview” at registration to save €20!

Tom: David, your 3-hour tutorial is titled “Mongo Sharding from the trench: A Veterans field guide.” Did your experience in working with vast amounts of data at Rackspace give you a unique perspective, in view, that now puts you into a position to help people just getting started? Can you give a couple examples?

David: I think this has been something organically I grew into from the days of supporting Cpanel type MySQL instances to today. I have worked for a few verticals from hosts to advertising to gaming, finally entering into the platform service. The others give me a host of knowledge around how customer need systems to work, and then the number and range of workloads we see at Rackspace re-enforces this.

ObjectRocket’s David Murphy

Many times the unique perspective comes with the scale such as someone calling up a single node to the multi-terabyte range. When they go to “shard” they can find the process that is normally very light and unnoticeable to most Mongo sharding can severally lock the metadata for an extended time. In other cases, the “balancer” might not be able to keep up with the amount of working being asked of it.

Toward the smaller end of the spectrum, having seen so many workloads from big to small. I can see similar thought processes and trends. When this happens having worked with some many of these workloads, and honestly having learned along the evolution of mongo helps me explain to clients the good, bad, and the hairy. Many times discussions come down to people not using connection pooling, non-indexed sorting, or complex operators such as $in, $nin, and more. In these cases, I can talk to people about the balance of using these concepts and when they will become bigger issues for them. My goal is to give them the enough knowledge to help determine when it is correct to use development resource to fix and issue, and when it’s manageable and that development could be better spent elsewhere.


Tom: The title of your tutorial also sounds like the perfect title of a book. Do you have any for one?

David: What an excellent question! I have thought about this. However, I think the goal of a book if I can find the time to do it. A working title might be “Mongo from the trenches: Surviving the minefield to get ahead”. I think the book might be broken into three sections:  “When should you use or not user Mongo”,  “Schema and Operatorators in the NoSQL world”, “Sharding”. I would do this as this could be a great mini book on its own the community really could use a level of depth similar to the MySQL 5.0 certification guides.  I liked these books as it helped someone understand all the bits of what to consider with your schema design and how it affects the application as much as the database hosts. Then in the second half more administration geared it took those same schema and design choices to help you manage them with confidence.

In the end, Mongo is a good product that works well for most people as it matures we need more and discussion. On topics such as what should you monitor, how you should predict issues, and how valuable are regular audits. Especially in an ecosystem where it’s easy to spin something up, launch it, and move on to the next project.


Tom: When and why would you recommend using MongoDB instead of MySQL?

David: I am glad I mentioned this is worthy of a book already, as it is such a complex topic and one that gets me very excited.

I feel there is a bit or misinformation on both sides of this field. Many in the MySQL camp of experts know when someone says they can’t get more than 1000 TPS via MySQL. 9 out of 10 times and design, not a technology issue,  the Mongo crowd love this and due to inherit sharding nature of Mongo they can sidestep these types of issues. Conversely in the Mongo camp you will hear how bad the  SQL standard is, however, omitting transactions for a moment, the same types of operations exist in MySQL and Mongo.  There are some interesting powers in the Mongo aggregation. However, SQL is more powerful and just as complex as some map reduce jobs and aggregations I have written.

As to your question, MySQL will always win in regards to repeatable reads to the database in a transaction. There is some talk of limited transactions in Mongo. However, these will likely not become global and cluster wide anytime soon if ever.  I don’t trust floats in Mongo for financials; it’s not that Mongo doesn’t do them but rather JavaScript type floats are present. Sometimes you need to store data as a 64-bit integer and do math in the app to make it a high precision float. MySQL, on the other hand, has excellent support for precision.

Another area is simply looking at the history of Mongo and MySQL.  Mongo until WiredTiger and  RocksDB were very similar to MyISAM from a locking behavior and support perspective. With the advent of the new storage system, we will-will see major leaps forward in types of flows you will want in Mongo. With the writer lock issue is gone, and locking between the systems is becoming more and more similar making deciding which much harder.

The news is not all use. However, subdocuments and array support in Mongo is amazing there are so many things  I can do in Mongo that even in bitwise SET/ENUM operators I could not do. So if you need that type of system, or you want to create a semi denormalize for of a view in the database. Mongo can do this with ease and on the fly. MySQL, on the other hand, would take careful planning and need whole tables updated.  In this regard I feel more people could use Mongo and is ability to have a versioned document schema allowing more incremental changes to documents. With new code  releases, allowing the application to read old version and “upgrade” them to the latest form. Removing a whole flurry of maintenance related pains that RDBMs have to the frustration of developers who just want to launch the new product.

The last thing I would want to say here is you need not choose, why not use both. Mongo can be very powerful for keeping a semi denormalized version of the data that is nimble to allow fast application or system updates and features. Leaving MySQL for a very specific workload that need the precision are simple are not expected to have schema changes.  I am a huge fan of keeping the transactional portions in MySQL, and the rest in Mongo. Allowing you to scale quickly up and down the build of your data needs, and more slowly change the parts that need to be 100% consistent all of the time with no room for eventual consistency.


Tom: What another session(s) are you most looking forward to besides your own at Percona Live Amsterdam?

David: There are a few that are near and dear to me.

Turtles all the way down: tuning Linux for database workloads” looks like a great one. It is one view I have always had, and DBA’s should be DBA’s,  SysAdmins, and Storage people rolled into one. That way they can understand the impacts of the application down to the blocks the database reads.

TokuDB internals” is another one. I have used TokuDB in MySQL and Mongo to some degree but as it has never had in-depth documentation. A topic like that is a great way to fill any gaps for experienced and new people alike.

Database Reliability Engineering” looks like a great talk from a great speaker.

As an InnoDB geek, I like the idea around “Understanding InnoDB locks: case studies.”

I see a huge amount of potential for MaxScale if anyone else is curious, “Anatomy of a Proxy Server: MaxScale Internals” should be good for R/W splits and split writing type cases.

Finally, one of my favorite people is Charity as she always is so energetic and can get to the heart of the matter. If you are not going to “Upgrade your database: without losing your data, your perf or your mind” you are missing out!


Tom: Thanks for speaking with me, David! Is there anything else you’d like to add: either about Rackspace or Percona Live Amsterdam?

David: In regards to Rackspace, I urge everyone to check out the Data Services group.  We handle everything from Redis to Hadoop with a goal of augmenting your groups or providing experts to help keep your uptime as high as possible. With options for dedicated hosts to platform type services, there is something that helps everyone. Rackspace is not just a cloud company but a real support company that provides amazing hardware to use, or support for other hardware location that is growing rapidly.

With Percona Amsterdam, everyone should come the group of speakers is simply amazing, I for one am excited by so many topics because they are all so compelling. Outside of that you will it hard find another a gathering of database experts with multiple technologies under their belt and who truly believe in the move to picking the right technology for the right use case.

The post ObjectRocket’s David Murphy talks about MongoDB, Percona Live Amsterdam appeared first on MySQL Performance Blog.

MyISAM performance drop after upgrade from 5.5 to 5.6

Lastest Forum Posts - August 26, 2015 - 5:09am

We recently upgraded our three-server cluster from Percona MySQL 5.5 to 5.6 and have run into problems with read performance on a number of MyISAM tables.

We started on CentOS 6.6 (Percona-Server-server-55-5.5.42-rel37.1.el6.x86_64) and upgrade to Percona MySQL 5.6 on Gentoo (percona-server-

The upgrade was done in-place, however the configuration was to some extent rebuilt as part of the upgrade.

An example table we're having problems with would look like this:

mysql> describe content.placement;
| Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
| storyid | int(11) | NO | PRI | 0 | |
| revision | int(11) | NO | PRI | 0 | |
| placementid | int(11) | NO | PRI | 0 | |
| platform | int(11) | NO | MUL | 0 | |
| cat_id | int(11) | NO | MUL | 0 | |
| layout | int(11) | NO | | 0 | |
| priority | int(11) | NO | MUL | 0 | |
| published_date | datetime | NO | MUL | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | |
| expire_date | datetime | NO | MUL | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | |
| topstory | tinyint(3) unsigned | NO | MUL | 0 | |
| status | tinyint(4) | NO | MUL | 0 | |
| revisionstatus | tinyint(4) | NO | MUL | 0 | |
| sort | tinyint(4) | NO | MUL | 0 | |
| topsort | tinyint(4) | NO | | 0 | |
| channeltop | tinyint(4) | NO | | 0 | |
| infinity | tinyint(4) | NO | | 0 | |

The query that is giving us grief is this one, a relatively simple one:

mysql> explain SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE storyid FROM placement WHERE cat_id IN (88,248,51,250,807,1534,1855,1860,2247,2457,4451) ORDER by published_date DESC LIMIT 50;
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
| 1 | SIMPLE | placement | index | cat_id,catpub | published_date | 8 | NULL | 2246 | Using where |
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

Our problem is that this query has a run-time seemingly randomly distributed between 0.05 and 3++ seconds. In 5.5, this query was consistently fast, i.e. less than 0.1s. Another confusing issue is that the chosen key seems to vary from server to server, but also from query execution to query execution.

We believe to have eliminated the underlying system as a source of problems. What we do however see is that the query seems to get stuck in various phases, and we don't quite understand why:

mysql> show profile for query 35;
| Status | Duration |
| starting | 0.000054 |
| checking permissions | 0.000004 |
| Opening tables | 0.000023 |
| init | 0.000021 |
| System lock | 0.000006 |
| optimizing | 0.000004 |
| statistics | 0.191296 |
| preparing | 0.000052 |
| Sorting result | 0.000016 |
| executing | 0.000006 |
| Sending data | 1.426275 |
| end | 0.000000 |
| query end | 0.000013 |
| closing tables | 0.000004 |
| freeing items | 0.000031 |
| cleaning up | 0.000026 |
16 rows in set, 1 warning (0,00 sec)


mysql> show profile for query 16;
| Status | Duration |
| starting | 0.000033 |
| checking permissions | 0.000004 |
| Opening tables | 0.000040 |
| init | 0.000066 |
| System lock | 0.000009 |
| optimizing | 0.000004 |
| statistics | 0.000035 |
| preparing | 0.000010 |
| Sorting result | 0.000003 |
| executing | 0.000002 |
| Sending data | 0.000004 |
| Creating sort index | 0.014366 |
| end | 0.000005 |
| query end | 0.000004 |
| closing tables | 0.000006 |
| freeing items | 0.000232 |
| cleaning up | 0.000109 |
17 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

Does anyone have any ideas where we should dig further? Our extensive attempts at research and debugging are bringing us nowhere at the moment - thank you in advance for any input.

Best regards

mysqldump import status mysql &amp;lt; filename

Lastest Forum Posts - August 25, 2015 - 4:44pm
-bash-3.2$ mysql -u root -pmypassword < Data.sql

ERROR 1142 (42000) at line 35275: SELECT,LOCK TABL command denied to user 'root'@'localhost' for table 'cond_instances'

I see some error while importing. What happens after first error , does import still keep going or just aborts. How do I know whether it has imported all dtabases/rows etc ?

Thanks a lot.

Advanced Query Tuning in MySQL 5.6 and MySQL 5.7 Webinar: Q&A

Latest MySQL Performance Blog posts - August 24, 2015 - 7:16am

Thank you for attending my July 22 webinar titled “Advanced Query Tuning in MySQL 5.6 and 5.7” (my slides and a replay available here). As promised here is the list of questions and my answers (thank you for your great questions).

Q: Here is the explain example:

mysql> explain extended select id, site_id from test_index_id where site_id=1 *************************** 1. row *************************** id: 1 select_type: SIMPLE table: test_index_id type: ref possible_keys: key_site_id key: key_site_id key_len: 5 ref: const rows: 1 filtered: 100.00 Extra: Using where; Using index

why is site_id a covered index for the query, given the fact that a) we are selecting “id”, b) key_site_id only contains site_id?

As the table is InnoDB, all secondary keys will always contain primary key (“id”); in this case the secondary index will contain all needed information to satisfy the above query and key_site_id will be “covered index”

Q: Applications change over time. Do you suggest doing a periodic analysis of indexes that are being used and drop the ones that are not? If yes, any suggestions as to tackle that?

Yes, that is a good idea. Usually it can be done easily with Percona toolkit or Performance_schema in MySQL 5.6

  1. Enable slow query log and log every query, then use Pt-index-usage tool
  2. Or use the following query (as suggested by FromDual blog post):

SELECT object_schema, object_name, index_name FROM performance_schema.table_io_waits_summary_by_index_usage WHERE index_name IS NOT NULL AND count_star = 0 ORDER BY object_schema, object_name;

Q: Does the duplicate index is found on 5.6/5.7 will that causes an performance impact to the db while querying?

Duplicate keys can have negative impact on selects:

  1. MySQL can get confused and choose a wrong index
  2. Total index size can grow, which can cause MySQL to run out of RAM

Q: What is the suggested method to measure performance on queries (other than the slow query log) so as to know where to create indexes?

Slow query log is most common method. In MySQL 5.6 you can also use Performance Schema and use events_statements_summary_by_digest table.

Q: I’m not sure if this was covered in the webinar but… are there any best-practices for fulltext indexes?

That was not covered in this webinar, however, I’ve done a number of presentations regarding Full Text Indexes. For example: Creating Geo Enabled Applications with MySQL 5.6

Q: What would be the limit on index size or number of indexes you can defined per table?

There are no limits on Index size on disk, however, it will be good (performance wise) to have active indexes fit in RAM.

In InnoDB there are a number of index limitations, i.e. a table can contain a maximum of 64 secondary indexes.

Q:  If a table has two columns you would like to sum, can you have that sum indexed as a calculated index? To add to that, can that calculated index have “case when”?

Just to clarify, this is only a feature of MySQL 5.7 (not released yet).

Yes, it is documented now:

CREATE TABLE triangle ( sidea DOUBLE, sideb DOUBLE, sidec DOUBLE AS (SQRT(sidea * sidea + sideb * sideb)) );

Q: I have noticed that you created indexes on columns like DayOfTheWeek with very low cardinality. Shouldn’t that be a bad practice normally?

Yes, you are right! Unless, you are doing queries like “select count(*) from … where DayOfTheWeek = 7” those indexes may not be very useful.

Q: I saw an article that if you don’t specify a primary key upfront mysql / innodb creates one in the background (hidden). Is it different from a primary key itself, if most of the where fields that are used not in the primary / semi primary key? And is there a way to identify the tables with the hidden primary key indexes?

The “hidden” primary key will be 6 bytes, which will also be appended (duplicated) to all secondary keys. You can create an INT primary key auto_increment, which will be smaller (if you do not plan to store more than 4 billion rows). In addition, you will not be able to use the hidden primary key in your queries.

The following query (against information_schema) can be used to find all tables without declared primary key (with “hidden” primary key):

SELECT tables.table_schema, tables.table_name, tables.table_rows FROM information_schema.tables LEFT JOIN ( SELECT table_schema, table_name FROM information_schema.statistics GROUP BY table_schema, table_name, index_name HAVING SUM( CASE WHEN non_unique = 0 AND nullable != 'YES' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END ) = COUNT(*) ) puks ON tables.table_schema = puks.table_schema AND tables.table_name = puks.table_name WHERE puks.table_name IS NULL AND tables.table_type = 'BASE TABLE' AND engine='InnoDB'

You may also use mysql.innodb_index_stats table to find rows with the hidden primary key:


mysql> select * from mysql.innodb_index_stats; +---------------+------------+-----------------+---------------------+--------------+------------+-------------+-----------------------------------+ | database_name | table_name | index_name | last_update | stat_name | stat_value | sample_size | stat_description | +---------------+------------+-----------------+---------------------+--------------+------------+-------------+-----------------------------------+ | test | t1 | GEN_CLUST_INDEX | 2015-08-08 20:48:23 | n_diff_pfx01 | 96 | 1 | DB_ROW_ID | | test | t1 | GEN_CLUST_INDEX | 2015-08-08 20:48:23 | n_leaf_pages | 1 | NULL | Number of leaf pages in the index | | test | t1 | GEN_CLUST_INDEX | 2015-08-08 20:48:23 | size | 1 | NULL | Number of pages in the index | +---------------+------------+-----------------+---------------------+--------------+------------+-------------+-----------------------------------+

Q: You are using the alter table to create index, but how does mysql sort the data for creating the index? isn’t it uses temp table for that?

That is a very good question: the behavior of the “alter table … add index” has changed over time. As documented in Overview of Online DDL:

Historically, many DDL operations on InnoDB tables were expensive. Many ALTER TABLE operations worked by creating a new, empty table defined with the requested table options and indexes, then copying the existing rows to the new table one-by-one, updating the indexes as the rows were inserted. After all rows from the original table were copied, the old table was dropped and the copy was renamed with the name of the original table.

MySQL 5.5, and MySQL 5.1 with the InnoDB Plugin, optimized CREATE INDEX and DROP INDEX to avoid the table-copying behavior. That feature was known as Fast Index Creation

When MySQL uses “Fast Index Creation” operation it will create a set of temporary files in MySQL’s tmpdir:

To add a secondary index to an existing table, InnoDB scans the table, and sorts the rows using memory buffers and temporary files in order by the values of the secondary index key columns. The B-tree is then built in key-value order, which is more efficient than inserting rows into an index in random order.

Q: How good is InnoDB deadlocks on 5.7 comparing to 5.6 version. Is that based on parameters setup?

InnoDB deadlocks discussion is outside of the scope of this presentation. Valerii Kravchuk and Nilnandan Joshi did an excellent talk at Percona Live 2015 (slides available): Understanding Innodb Locks and Deadlocks

Q: What is the performance impact of generating a virtual column for a table having 66 Million records and generating the index. And how would you go about it? Do you have any suggestions on how to re organize indexes on the physical disk?

As MySQL 5.7 is not released yet, behavior of the virtual columns may change.  The main question here is: will it be online operations to a) add a virtual column (as this is only metadata change it should be very light operation anyway). b) add index on that virtual column. In the labs released it was not online, however this can change.

Thank you again for attending.

The post Advanced Query Tuning in MySQL 5.6 and MySQL 5.7 Webinar: Q&A appeared first on MySQL Performance Blog.

Which situation it's suitable to set &amp;quot;tokudb_directio=1&amp;quot;?

Lastest Forum Posts - August 22, 2015 - 2:02am
As title means, I couldn't find which situation to set "tokudb_directio=1" in documentation,anyone knows?

Fresh Install: ERROR! The server quit without updating PID file

Lastest Forum Posts - August 21, 2015 - 9:38am
Starting MySQL (Percona Server).. ERROR! The server quit without updating PID file (/var/lib/mysql/mysql.pid).

Fresh install on new server. Created config file using the configuration wizard.

Server will not start. Tried permissions, removing ib_logfile's.

Server is amazon small instance. Any help would be great.

Log file:

150821 16:26:30 mysqld_safe mysqld from pid file /var/lib/mysql/mysql.pid ended
150821 16:27:24 mysqld_safe Starting mysqld daemon with databases from /var/lib/mysql/
2015-08-21 16:27:25 0 [Warning] TIMESTAMP with implicit DEFAULT value is deprecated. Please use --explicit_defaults_for_timestamp server option (see documentation for more details).
2015-08-21 16:27:25 0 [Warning] 'ERROR_FOR_DIVISION_BY_ZERO' is deprecated and will be removed in a future release.
2015-08-21 16:27:25 0 [Note] /usr/sbin/mysqld (mysqld 5.6.25-73.1-log) starting as process 5547 ...
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Warning] Using unique option prefix myisam-recover instead of myisam-recover-options is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Please use the full name instead.
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Plugin 'FEDERATED' is disabled.
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: Using atomics to ref count buffer pool pages
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: The InnoDB memory heap is disabled
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: Mutexes and rw_locks use GCC atomic builtins
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: Memory barrier is not used
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: Compressed tables use zlib 1.2.3
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: Using Linux native AIO
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: Using CPU crc32 instructions
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: Initializing buffer pool, size = 1.4G
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: Completed initialization of buffer pool
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] InnoDB: Restoring page 0 of tablespace 0
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Warning] InnoDB: Doublewrite does not have page_no=0 of space: 0
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [ERROR] InnoDB: space header page consists of zero bytes in data file ./ibdata1
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [ERROR] InnoDB: Could not open or create the system tablespace. If you tried to add new data files to the system tablespace, and it failed here, you should now edit innodb_data_file_path in my.cnf back to what it was,
and remove the new ibdata files InnoDB created in this failed attempt. InnoDB only wrote those files full of zeros, but did not yet use them in any way. But be careful: do not remove old data files which contain your precious data!
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [ERROR] Plugin 'InnoDB' init function returned error.
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [ERROR] Plugin 'InnoDB' registration as a STORAGE ENGINE failed.
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [ERROR] Unknown/unsupported storage engine: InnoDB
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [ERROR] Aborting

2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Binlog end
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'partition'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'ARCHIVE'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'BLACKHOLE'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_CHANGED_PAGES'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_SYS_DATAFILES'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_SYS_TABLESPACES'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_SYS_FOREIGN_COLS'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_SYS_FOREIGN'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_SYS_FIELDS'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_SYS_COLUMNS'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_SYS_INDEXES'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_SYS_TABLESTATS'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_SYS_TABLES'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_FT_INDEX_TABLE'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_FT_INDEX_CACHE'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_FT_CONFIG'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_FT_BEING_DELETED'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_FT_DELETED'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_FT_DEFAULT_STOPWORD'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_METRICS'
2015-08-21 16:27:25 5547 [Note] Shutting down plugin 'INNODB_BUFFER_POOL_STATS'